Dissolution of the Distinct Society Pay Equity At First Nations Employed, Salaried Persons
Without Prejudice Pay Scales - Income Tax – Benefits Issue Errors & Omissions Excepted
October 28th, 2010
&
Elizabeth II – Windsor Sacshen Coburg und Gotha
Governor-In-Council Canada
Parliament : House of Commons & Senate
Provincial Legislatures and Territories
Whereas
In the general public claim of Elizabeth II and agent Canada there is a claimed set-in-law Constitution Act 1982; with an accompanying Charter of Rights and Freedoms(2). The Canadian Human Rights Commission noted that aboriginal peoples gained voting enfranchisement in 1960.
Elizabeth II and agent Canada claim state nation status at the United Nations; and, the preceding League of Nations; and, therein, have endorsed certain Conventions; but, has not registered any claimed Treaty with Original Peoples [in this context this refers to all aboriginal, first indigenous peoples; and, recognizes the Blackfoot as the first claim to this term].
Elizabeth II and agent Canada have constructed and legislated under the auspices of this said Constitution Act 1982 and its preceding British North America specific legislative implements to manage the affairs of the Original Peoples – to which, under the Indian Act these Peoples are named to be Indians. Under the Charter, aboriginal peoples of Canada includes Indian, Metis and Inuit peoples.
The Constitution Act 1982 created a specific legislative reference to these Original Peoples. And, the Income Tax Act of Canada provides for specific taxation exemption sections for these “aboriginal peoples”; wherein, under specific circumstances, they may be relieved of the tax burden generally applied to other Canadians.
It is a common practise that First Nations / Indian Reserves under the Indian Act will employ non-native / aboriginal / Indian / Metis / Inuit persons [commonly in supervisory positions]. And, it is estimated that circa 60% of the $9-billion of annual funding into First Nations will be absorbed in one context or another by non-native employees and consultant or private contracting parties.
Where non-native persons are employed by a First Nation it is alleged that there occurs an upgrade of income and benefits to non-natives to compensate for the tax burden that they will experience; and, there this practise appears to dissolve the non-taxation provisions to Original Peoples who are working for First Nations and who may be qualified to assume the duties that are occupied by non-natives / aboriginal persons. Audited Annual Reports of First nations will attest to these allegations as being fact.
Therefore
Is it the condoned / approved / known practise and intent of Elizabeth II / agent Canada government policy to recognize an Original Peoples unique status in one legislative tool; and, then, to dissolve these provisions by specific policy provisions that effectively remove these provisions that have been created as some apparent form of recognition of Original Peoples and their suffrage thereof ?
Is it the condoned / approved / known practise and intent of Elizabeth II / agent Canada government policy to recognize an Original Peoples unique status in one legislative tool; and, then, to dissolve these provisions by specific policy provisions that effectively remove these provisions that have been created as some apparent form of recognition of Original Peoples and their suffrage thereof ?
This question is couched in the context of Elizabeth II’s Coronation Oath in 1953 [“The Queen having returned to her Chair (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the fourth day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen, Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath? And the Queen answering, I am willing. The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and the Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer each question severally as follows: Archbishop: Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs? Queen: I solemnly promise so to do. Archbishop: Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements? Queen: I will. ”]; and, is compared to the Oath of Allegiance Canada.
Finally, we offer these questions to your consideration within the parameter of absence of a Treaty between Elizabeth II and Original Peoples.
Your response by email is appreciated at an early date [<30 Days] so that we may apprise our clients of your standing on this ISSUE: Is it the position of Elizabeth II and agent Canada to continue discriminatory pay practises at First Nations employment centres; wherein, non-natives receive pay / benefit increments to compensate for not being native / aboriginal / Original Peoples; which, therein, dissolves the unique “aboriginal peoples” recognition in the Canada Constitution / Charter and Income Tax Act ?
Ralph Charles Goodwin / Yuxwuletun
Chairperson Touchstone Committee [since 1975]
